The article “Is the Zika virus a real threat to pregnant women, oris this perception unwarranted and based on coincidence?”reveals how the infection does not have the credible evidence tosupport its existence and effect. Pavel Calda, who is the author,questions the methods that were used in analyzing how the women wereaffected by the virus. Besides that, it also insists how mostscholars have been unable to illustrate how the Zika virus results inthe fetal anomaly. The authors also show how the entire globalinitiative to sensitize the masses was based on insufficientevidence. They also support their arguments with enough evidence thatpersuades the reader to follow their line of thought too. The essaywill provide an analysis of the article and how the author presentedtheir information.
Calda subdivides the entire paper into different sub-topics thathandle the paper independently. More importantly, Zika virus is alarge topic and handling it in general might be a bit ambiguous andit might fail to address all the critical issues needed. Hence, Caldadivides the entire topic into multiple sections and questions thevalidity each in older to pass across the article’s argument. Thediscussion tackle one issue at a time and that helps the reader inunderstanding the course of the argument. First, the author beginswith the origin of the virus and its morbidity rate that was seen inBrazil where the article highlights all the background informationneeded. Later, the author also reveals the Microcephaly diagnosis andidentifies other causes that might cause the abnormality (Calda, 15).After that, Calda questions how the various scholars have connectedthe Zika virus to the CNS defects such as the Microcephaly cases. Theorganization of the discussion follows a proper outline thatintroduces the reader before getting deeper into the topic. Thisessay reveals how the article relies on recent scientific researchand other credible academic sources to support its arguments and makeit more appealing.
More importantly, the article relies on the recent scientificresearch on the Zika virus to reveal how the previous studies arestill in doubt. The main theme is questioning the existing studies onZika virus and how they have relied on insufficient evidence to raiseawareness. In this case, Calda relies on recent research on theinfection to support the arguments that the article presents. Infact, he goes through a number of journal articles and concludes thatmost of them have insufficient information. He argues based on theway that none of the current scientific research has proved how theinfection moves from the mother to the fetus. He disapproves theassumption by showing other factors that might lead to the abnormalfeatures that a baby might have other than the Zika virus. He alsorelies on recent research to show how the article is credible enoughand he urges other scholars to undertake further research beforepresenting information on the way the Zika virus spreads. Morespecifically, he reveals what the current studies have been unable todetermine the transmission process, and how it reaches the fetus. Tosome extent, he is willing to ignore his current line of thought ifthe scientists provide enough evidence to support their assumptions.The article bases its arguments on the recent scientific research andsince most of the current article has provided that gives the authorthe right to question their credibility instead.
Besides the recent scientific research, the article uses sufficientand credible sources to support the arguments presented. In thisscenario, Calda questions the credibility of various scholarlyjournal articles, and to achieve that he has to rely on crediblesources that will disapprove such arguments. The presence of theproper sources also strengthens the authority of the article since itsupports each of the sentiments with a wide range of evidence. Infact, the author opens the eyes of the readers that also understandhis line of thought and question whether the Zika virus as a menaceas portrayed or not. The scenario also reveals how the articleproperly analyzes and highlights the way that the current scholarshave looked at the Zika virus. The proper analysis and thepresentation of the arguments show what the article looks at theessence of creating the paper as well. In the absence of the sources,it will be difficult to prove the authenticity of the arguments sincethey will seem baseless. However, the multiple journal articles helpin supporting the assumptions and illustrating how the author is onthe right path.
In conclusion, the article was able to address specific issues at atime, base the arguments on the recent scientific research and usethe credible sources that supported the assumptions that the authorpresented. In this case, the Zika virus is a vast topic but, theauthor was able to identify the specific issues that had variousconcerns that the author wanted to clarify. The proper analysis helpsin introducing the readers and persuading them to understand theperspective that the author addresses. The author also relies onrecent scientific research to reveal how the current studies havefailed to justify their claims with the help of credible evidence. Onthe other hand, the use of the reliable sources also supported thearguments and ensured that the paper had an academic outlook itdeserves.
Calda, Pavel. "Is the Zika virus a real threat to pregnantwomen, or is this perception unwarranted and based on coincidence?."Actual Gynecology & Obstetrics/Aktuální Gynekologie aPorodnictví 8 (2016).