PositiveImpact of Television on Presidential Election

Ina democracy, someone who fails to get elected to office can alwaysconsole himself with the thought that there was something not quitefair about it. There came a time that the television narrowed thegap of a shadow of doubt on this very factor. It idea involves thenumerous achievements participating in the decision-making processesas well as the roles the television to elections over the years. Thediscovery of television in 1940 left people with beliefs of aninvolved political nation as time went by. The idea of ElectoralCollege left individuals with no direct connection to their leaders aproblem that television was up to solving. There then came the issueof presidential debates all in the process of ensuring that theimportance of television in the anticipated goal set. Consideringall that was set at the beginning l believe television displayedremarkable positive impacts on presidential elections throughensuring citizens know there presidents in person, help in showingdemocracy and help people be cynical to election-related concepts inthe country (Hart2012).

Citizensof the United States of America now know their presidents in personthrough the help of television and prepare in the best ways possiblewhen it comes to the decision-making process.As earlier said, television with its penetration and its widegeographic distribution and impact helps with the provision of a newsensitive link between the president and the people in hand. Theyfeel their representation is a free and fair process through thefollow-up process of each and every event going on with theirrespective presidential aspirants. They can see how they respond to adifferent situation such as through presidential debates andinterviews that are broadcasted on the television. Through thesecitizens prove television influence as positive since they are giventhe privilege of getting to know their presidential aspirants.

Thereis the benefit of showing different levels of democracy when it comesto televisions as a mode of involving individuals to politicalaspects.With an exclusion of televisions broadcast voters will feel as thoughthere is the omission of some different facts which will most likelylead to mass scrutiny from the belief of undemocratic procedures.That was however not the idea at the time back then in 1960 as theconcept of television debates was trying to come. John F Kennedydefeated Nixon because of some issues and among them involved thelight colored suit, wrong makeup, and bad posture. Comments such as,“our politics has become a competition for images rather thanideas. As time went by citizens saw the importance of all theseconcepts to the countries leadership. This, therefore, shows howtelevision has helped with bringing about democracy (Menand 2004)

Fromlow levels of education and limited exposure, citizens allowed theelectoral body to make decisions they were not sure of when it cameto presidential elections. Television,however, has brought about education and clarity that has helped withcynical thinking since individuals are often motivated byself-interests and human sincerity or integrity.We were looking at issues such as President Cronkite and how hiseffort of stopping the war in Vietnam proved beneficial to theofficial figure and individuals cynical show how social media isuseful. Through all how open people grow to show the positiveimportance of television to presidential elections of the UnitedStates of America ( Ranney 1983).

Inconclusion, it is evident how much television broadcast provesbeneficial to presidential elections. The idea comes from the factthat it helps display democracy, brings about understanding as wellas knowledge of citizens and their candidates. The ability to leadvoters cynical and open minded about presidential aspects is also theanother beneficial factor television brings to elections.